Get your ow
n diary at DiaryLand.com!doitdoitdoit contact me older entries~#!!1 newest entry

Backwards <-> Forwards

, / \ , (_/________\_) 境幻虛太 無 _ 假 為 / \作 有i i真 處| |時 有| |真 還| |亦 無| |假 http://coolkid99lol.diaryland.com/index.rss 空中樓閣,鏡花水月 +--------------+ |.------------.| || Hello! || || you? || || Good - || || something..|| |+------------+| +-..--------..-+ .--------------. / /============ / /============== /____________________ \____________________/ ho hum

February 27, 2004 - 7:21 p.m.

A Clockwork Orange is a novel(Burgess) and a movie(Kubrick) about a violent youth and the government's brainwashing cure that removes the choice to do wrong. "Burgess, both a writer and an established linguist, uses A Clockwork Orange as a vessel for some very mature exploration of languages and literary play-things. Burgess fuses together many different languages in A Clockwork Orange to create Nadsat, the language of the youth. Nadsat is made up mainly of Russian, child speak, and invented and British slang, but it also utilizes Malay, German, French, Arabic, and Gypsy. The word Nadsat comes from the Russian word nadsat, a suffix for the numbers 11 through 19--the teenage numbers (Lund). The title A Clockwork Orange is derived from several sources. Used in old London slang, one might say someone is "as queer as a clockwork orange" (Burgess, "Resucked" x). In Nadsat, "orange" means "man" (which is derived from the Malay word "orang," meaning "man"), so a clockwork orange would be a man moving without pause or thought, as a clockwork (Lund). Burgess says of the title, "I mean it to stand for the application of a mechanistic morality to a living organism oozing with juice and sweetness" ("Resucked" x). After the state reforms him, the novel's hero and narrator Alex becomes a clockwork orange, a man working as a machine. " "What does God want? Does God want goodness or the choice of goodness? Is a man who chooses the bad perhaps in some way better than a man who has the good imposed upon him?" - Burgess This strikes me as a bit like China's free speach problem. Should they try to force people to be 'good' by restricting free speach, or give the people the right to choose and bring chaos. Burgess would say choice at all costs. Kaiser Kuo disagrees. he unleashes a megasentence: 'As hideously condescending as it sounds -- even, I confess, to my own ear -- I just don't think, given the massive spatial inequalities, the low level of education in rural areas, the delicate and dangerous balance of population to resources, the utter lack of a pluralistic tradition, the latent fissiparous tendencies in the Chinese polity, and the horrible scale of human suffering that could be unleashed should things spin too wildly out of control, that China is "ready" for full -fledged mutliparty democracy -- or even for things Americans take for granted, like free speech, free assembly, or total freedom of worship.' Followed up by The Parentheses of Apocalyptic Worst Case Scenario TERROR: '(I have this recurring nightmare where China becomes truly democratic, a populist party running on the single-plank platform of opposition to the One Child Policy sweeps into office, and the floodgates are flung suddenly open to rabid nationalists, all manner of chiliastic/millennarian cultists, regional splittists, and plain-old gangsters).' A product of state media fear mongering or legitimate concerns? i do not know.

previous - next

about me - read my profile!~!~!haeelolol read other Diar

yLand diaries! recommend my diary to a friend! Get
 your own fun + free diary at DiaryLand.com!gogogogodoit! ^^^^noo combined companions biscuit banana coffee friendly mcvittie