A Clockwork Orange
is a novel(Burgess) and a movie(Kubrick) about a violent
youth and the government's brainwashing cure that
removes the choice to do wrong.
"Burgess, both a writer and an established linguist,
uses A Clockwork Orange as a vessel for some very mature
exploration of languages and literary play-things.
Burgess fuses together many different languages in A
Clockwork Orange to create Nadsat, the language of the
youth. Nadsat is made up mainly of Russian, child speak,
and invented and British slang, but it also utilizes
Malay, German, French, Arabic, and Gypsy. The word
Nadsat comes from the Russian word nadsat, a suffix for
the numbers 11 through 19--the teenage numbers (Lund).
The title A Clockwork Orange is derived from several
sources. Used in old London slang, one might say someone
is "as queer as a clockwork orange" (Burgess, "Resucked"
x). In Nadsat, "orange" means "man" (which is derived
from the Malay word "orang," meaning "man"), so a
clockwork orange would be a man moving without pause or
thought, as a clockwork (Lund).
Burgess says of the title, "I mean it to stand for the
application of a mechanistic morality to a living
organism oozing with juice and sweetness" ("Resucked"
x). After the state reforms him, the novel's hero and
narrator Alex becomes a clockwork orange, a man working
as a machine. "
"What does God want? Does God want goodness or the
choice of goodness? Is a man who chooses the bad perhaps
in some way better than a man who has the good imposed
upon him?" - Burgess
This strikes me as a bit like China's free speach
problem. Should they try to force people to be 'good'
by restricting free speach, or give the people
the right to choose and bring
chaos. Burgess would say choice
at all costs.
Kaiser Kuo disagrees. he
unleashes a megasentence:
'As hideously condescending as
it sounds -- even, I confess,
to my own ear -- I just don't
think, given the massive
spatial inequalities, the low
level of education in rural
areas, the delicate and
dangerous balance of
population to resources,
the utter lack of a
pluralistic tradition, the
latent fissiparous tendencies
in the Chinese polity, and
the horrible scale of human
suffering that could be
unleashed should things spin
too wildly out of control, that
China is "ready" for full
-fledged mutliparty democracy
-- or even for things
Americans take for granted,
like free speech, free assembly, or total freedom of worship.'
Followed up by The Parentheses of Apocalyptic Worst Case
Scenario TERROR:
'(I have this recurring nightmare where China becomes
truly democratic, a populist party running on the
single-plank platform of opposition to the One Child
Policy sweeps into office, and the floodgates are flung
suddenly open to rabid nationalists, all manner of
chiliastic/millennarian cultists, regional splittists,
and plain-old gangsters).'
A product of state media fear mongering or legitimate
concerns? i do not know.