Backwards <-> Forwards
, / \ ,
(_/________\_)
境幻虛太
無 _ 假
為 / \作
有i i真
處| |時
有| |真
還| |亦
無| |假
http://coolkid99lol.diaryland.com/index.rss
空中樓閣,鏡花水月
+--------------+
|.------------.|
|| Hello! ||
|| you? ||
|| Good - ||
|| something..||
|+------------+|
+-..--------..-+
.--------------.
/ /============
/ /==============
/____________________
\____________________/
ho hum
|
March 07, 2004 - 7:24 p.m.
QUOTATIONS
.The Smiths
'The Cemetery Gates' from their album 'The Queen is
Dead'. Go and buy it. The songs have lovely
melodies as well as great/quirky lyrics. It's
consistantly good and one of the best albums i have
ever heard.
He pronounces 'plagiarise' 'play guh rise'
instead of a soft 'page' g.
A dreaded sunny day
so I meet you at the cemetery gates
Keats and Yeats are on your side
A dreaded sunny day
so I meet you at the cemetery gates
Keats and Yeats are on your side
while Wilde is on mine
So we go inside and we gravely read the stones
all those people all those lives
where are they now?
with the loves and hates
and passions just like mine
they were born
and then they lived and then they died
seems so unfair
and I want to cry
You say: "ere thrice the sun done salutation to the dawn"
and you claim these words as your own
but I've read well, and I've heard them said
a hundred times, maybe less, maybe more
If you must write prose and poems
the words you use should be your own
don't plagiarise or take "on loans"
there's always someone, somewhere
with a big nose, who knows
and who trips you up and laughs
when you fall
who'll trip you up and laugh
when you fall
You say: "ere long done do does did"
words which could only be your own
and then you then produce the text
from whence was ripped some dizzy whore, 1804
A dreaded sunny day
so let's go where we're happy
and I meet you at the cemetery gates
Oh Keats and Yeats are on your side
A dreaded sunny day
so let's go where we're wanted
and I meet you at the cemetery gates
Keats and Yeats are on your side
but you lose because Wilde is on mine
-===-------=-=--===--=---==
.IEE FLAAME YOO!!~!~!
'Anyone who defends her is her friend, and everyone
else is the enemy. It's pretty typical behaviour
for middle-class, borderline bipolar kids in the
US.'
http://pekingduck.org/archives/001049.php
'Up-update: In yet another post all about how she
(glutter) wants to be totally alone and solitary, a
wise commenter uses two quotes to offer gentle
counsel:' [aarrg he calls me wise then deletes this
comment. I guess he changed his mind! awe well,
it made my day anyway. The direct link above still
works!]
http://glutter.typepad.com/glutter/2004
/02/wwwglutterorg_a.html#comments
"The person who tries to live alone will not
succeed as a human being. His heart withers if it
does not answer another heart. His mind shrinks
away if he hears only the echoes of his own
thoughts and finds no other inspiration."
-Pearl S. Buck
"It is easy in the world to live after the world's
opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our
own; but the great man is he who in the midst of
the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the
independence of solitude."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Posted by: dingwenyue at February 24, 2004 08:24 PM
Shit. What a load of shit. Sorry.
Posted by: Glutterbug at February 24, 2004 09:35 PM
BTW, You're another China blogger I do not know.
Have no idea who, never been to your blog who feels
they have something important to say about how I
should lead my life. Please don't bother. I find
far too many of you annoying at best, ridiculous in
the median, dispicable at worse. Who do you think
you are? Because whatever it is, that's not how I
view you.
Yan
Posted by: Glutterbug at February 24, 2004 09:37 PM
im not chinese and im not a blogger.
As a human being I suggest you need a hug.
If you dont want people saying things about how you
lead your life i suggest you dont write a public
personal website with a comments section.
Posted by: dingwenyue at February 24, 2004 10:26 PM
i am afraid i learned a lesson today about what
dingwenyue said--opening yourself up to criticism.
I got an email from my dad today, who was deeply
disappointed with the foul language i used on my
blog and with my continual disparaging of the US
and the President. Despite the fact that i think he
is brainwashed by US conservatives, i still felt
sad to let him down. but then i stepped back and
realized that i was right, and i had always been,
and i wasn't going to be guilted or platituded into
shutting up.
So I have to agree with you. Though I like Emerson,
but hate Buck, quoting out of context is just
another way to avoid an actual criticism--something
else my dad is good at.
It's like trying to fit a non-sequitor peg into an
a propos hole.
[apropos
adj : of an appropriate or pertinent nature
[ant: malapropos] adv 1: by the way; "apropos,
can you lend me some money for the weekend?"
[syn: incidentally] 2: at an opportune time;
"your letter arrived apropos" [syn: seasonably,
timely, well-timed]
[French à propos : à, to (from Old French a, from
Latin ad-. See ad-) + propos, purpose (from Latin
propositum, neuter past participle of proponere,
to intend. See propose).]
]
Posted by: tiger at February 25, 2004 02:29 AM
I do feel dingwenyue is right, to a degree, about
solitude. If you live in your own world, then it's
easy to have strong opinions. But if you open
yourself up to opposing forces, then it encourages
you to think and/or strengthen your claims and your
beliefs.
Like how I visit some sites to better understand
their hypocrisy, to better put them in their place
in future thoughts and beliefs. (Not referring to
your site).
Although, I do think in your case, you are
disassociating with LIC for your own valid reasons
and I commend that. However, for many of these
people, "living in china" is very much "that" which
you don't like and have a problem with, and not
much else. Unfortunately.
Just my two cents worth.
Posted by: Eshin at February 25, 2004 11:56 AM
I can't say I agree with dingwenyue because I don't
think the comparison is an apt one. Certainly not
the Buck quote - Yan's not shrinking away from the
crowd, just stating a preference about which crowd.
Glutter is still open to public reading and links
to alot of blogs. Buck's quote didn't mean you had
to hang out with everybody no matter how much you
dislike them. LiC is like a club or a bar, and it's
not the only one in town.
And dingwenyue, I think there's a difference
between commenting about "how someone leads their
life" and how someone writes their blog. Even as
naked as the Laowai Monologues are, it's still a
text - I don't know the guy for real and most
likely never will. There's life, and there's life
at 56K (to paraphrase Truffaut).
[French New Wave filmmaker whose works include
The 400 Blows (1959) and Jules and Jim (1961).
he seems to have loads of people quoting his
'witty' generalisations on the net, but i cant
find anything like the one above. I guess he's
talking about the difference between life as
presented on a webpage, and someone's real life.
That is a truism!
Tru"ism, n. [From True.] An undoubted or
self-evident truth; a statement which is pliantly
true; a proposition needing no proof or argument;
-- opposed to falsism.
Trifling truisms clothed in great, swelling
words. --J. P. Smith.]
Don't presume to know about Yan's life.
Posted by: Dave at February 25, 2004 01:34 PM
I was probably a far too harsh on Ding, because
it's not him who really bugs me. So I apologise for
my words. Although a gentler sentiment still holds.
However, it's a continual battle to be not attacked
by the losers of the China blogging community for
saying what I say.
I don't think solitude is a bad thing. I think far
too many people spend time NOT being by themselves
and thinking.
It's not like I don't have readers in the context
of Glutter, or in the case of real life, friends.
Actually as time has gone on, I although I was very
cynical about Internet "friendships" I think I have
gone to see most of the commenters on this blog as
some form of friends. I don't know if any of them
will ever translate into "real" life, but at least
they are people who exist in my mind with valid
things to say. I suppose if someone I knew, who has
commented on it, then I will listen, but those who
know the circumstances would not say that because
as Eshin said. "Valid Reasons."
Yan
Posted by: Glutterbug at February 25, 2004 01:40 PM
'Acceptance: We do not all agree and we don't have
to. Please do not expect others to say you are
right, because there are plenty of people all the
time who think you might not be.
Do not criticize the owner of this blog'
I think that's quite funny.
- but fair enough! your blog your rules.
pff... ill add a bit more because im bored and i
want to communicate, however ineptly.
' A personal attack is classified as a comment made
to the person themselves rather than what they
said'
You cant draw a line between criticising what you
say and criticising _you_. Everything on here is
what you say. I cant launch a personal attack. If i
say 'you are stupid' it would mean i think what you
wrote is stupid. I cant criticise your physical
appearance so..
I wonder if most blog hostility isnt just a symptom
of bordom. Im going to leave my computer and go for
a walk.
Posted by: dingwenyue at February 26, 2004 01:18 AM
You can't really tell the difference between the
two? Man. I really don't want YOU or your opinions
here. Okay? :)
[I think that sarcastic smile when you're
really angry is good argument technique in real
life too. It reminds me of angry women and it
scares me. seriously.]
Yan
Posted by: Glutterbug at February 26, 2004 01:24 AM
BTW. I could simple disagree with you and say
"there is a difference" and explain it or I can
call you a LOSER. (Taking props from Chrissie
Hynde.) Now since you can't tell the difference I
will stick with the personal attack.
dingwenyue YOU ARE A LOSER.
No one really cares what you think because none of
us know you. You have not proved yourself as anyone
with any intelligence or worthy words except that
you can go into "Wisdom Quotes" and pick out
something you percieve might give you some borrowed
glory of being smart because you found it.
I bet you don't even know who Buck and Emerson is,
unlike some people who come on this site.
Why tell us you are going for a walk? Like anyone
here gives a shit about what you do in your life.
You can drown in a pond and all I can say is, "Oh,
yeah, that guy came in the blog once and left a
comment or two. He kinda seemed like a loser. How
sad."
Posted by: Glutterbug at February 26, 2004 01:29 AM
You're right i dont know Buck and Emerson, i just
liked the quotation. Are they American writers? I
guess you could say im still near the start of my
book reading career.
Im sorry if ive upset you, but if im a looser i
assure you its the teenage angst kind rather than
the evil bald gweilo kind. You assume im a guy, but
my teacher told me Ding WenYue was a girl's name?
hmpf, maybe its unisex.
I enjoy reading your website and i hope you wont
ban me. But ill cancel that invitation to do a
reading at my funeral.
Posted by: dingwenyue at February 26, 2004 03:22 AM
[damn i was too fawning in that last comment]
fawning
Fawn Fawn, v. i. [imp. & p. p. Fawned; p. pr. &
vb. n. Fawning.] [OE. fawnen, fainen, fagnien, to
rejoice, welcome, flatter, AS. f[ae]gnian to
rejoice; akin to Icel. fagna to rejoice, welcome.
See Fain.] To court favor by low cringing,
frisking, etc., as a dog; to flatter meanly; --
often followed by on or upon.
You showed your teeth like apes, and fawned like
hounds. --Shak.
Thou with trembling fear, Or like a fawning
parasite, obeyest. --Milton.
Courtiers who fawn on a master while they betray
him. --Macaulay.
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.
previous - next
combined companions
biscuit banana coffee
friendly mcvittie
|